Snapchat does it again with offensive filters


Screen Shot 2016-08-29 at 6.05.56 PM

Sophie Ford

Since its inception in late 2011, Snapchat has arguably become one of the most popular social media applications out there, especially for the younger generation. Unfortunately, it has recently cemented its status of possibly one of the most racist social media applications too.

Snapchat most recently came under fire for its implementation of a filter displaying what can most accurately be described as blatant yellow face. The filter overlaid the user’s face, giving the user slanted lines for eyes, reddened faces and cartoonish large buck teeth. These features are the hallmarks of classic yellow face.

Snapchat tried to explain the filter as an artist’s interpretation of an “anime-inspired” filter. It’s a weak response however, as anime characters are usually displayed with larger-than-normal eyes and relatively small mouths.

Nonetheless, Snapchat ultimately apologized for the filter and vowed it would never go into circulation again. Perhaps Snapchat could learn from their mistake…if they hadn’t already made a mistake prior to this event to learn from already.

Earlier this year, on what is colloquially referred to as “4/20,” Snapchat released a Bob Marley filter, featuring a flag, a beanie styled after the ones Marley famously wore…along with dreadlocks and a filter that made the user’s face brown. Anybody familiar with the terms “blackface” or “cultural appropriation” should already see the issue here.

When a white person darkens their skin to create a caricature of a race, they spit in the face in the people who deal with both institutionalized and blatant racism on a day-to-day basis. The filter also further perpetuated the idea that smoking marijuana was Marley’s most famous achievement, when in fact he was an immensely talented musician and still remains an icon to many even today. It’s revolting that we overlook a black man’s achievements and turn his legacy into nothing more than a racist joke in an app.

While Snapchat has been quick to remove blatantly racist filters such as the yellow face filter and the Bob Marley filter, the app still perpetuates a much grander problem in terms of race. In an article for Complex, author Vrinda Jagota pointed out that many of Snapchats filters directed towards beautification rather than humor tend to favor white and western ideals of beauty.

For example, the ever popular flower crown filter actually lightens the user’s skin. This is egregiously problematic, especially considering the reality that many people in certain areas of Asia face an immense pressure to use skin lightening products and bleaches in order to make themselves seem as what their society views as more attractive. This isn’t the only filter.

After the popularity of the flower crown filter, Snapchat introduced a new filter which featured a glowing crown of butterflies, but also significantly narrowed features of the face including the nose. Narrow noses are a standard of beauty that specifically stem from white ideals of beauty.

The narrowed nose and white skin are both featured in what is commonly referred to as Snapchat’s “pretty” filter. Those ideals combined with the name of the filter on their own should be issue enough.

Racist once…shame on you. Racist twice? Someone needs to fire a few board members and perhaps do some sensitivity training. Racist three times? It would be easy to assume that Snapchat would be regarded by the masses under great scrutiny, but the real kicker to the whole racist Snapchat fiasco is that nobody is really paying any attention to it.

There have been a few stories reported here and there about Snapchat’s repeated racism from niche online news sites, but the mainstream media remains exceptionally silent…and exceptionally complacent. It’s a common issue across the social structure of the U.S.: if a race issue isn’t deemed headline-worthy enough to garner plenty of clicks on a news site or enough views on the nightly news, it gets swept under the rug.

It’s easy enough for white people to look at something for a second and say “Oh, that’s terrible,” and move on with their lives. I cannot speak on behalf of any people of color, but I would imagine that any amount of racism experienced must be another drop in the perhaps already full bucket of institutionalized racism experienced in the U.S.

So what can be done? If all it takes for Snapchat to recover from every racist incident is to apologize and pull a filter from the app, then no-body is ever going to truly learn from these mistakes.

Nobody needs to use or support Snapchat. Instagram’s latest update includes a new story mode, which allows users to upload temporary pictures for all of their followers to view in a similar vein to Snapchat. Even without that, perhaps the inconvenience of not being able to send disappearing images to each other is worth not being part of the complacency towards racism that still proliferates society today.




  1. I didn’t think either of the “offending” filters were blatant racist when I saw them on Snapchat; they just seemed to be more in a long procession of strange and offbeat filters. The “yellow face” filter I thought was clearly Anime inspired, compare the popular image at
    I used that same filter on myself (and would post the image here if possible) and although it did lighten the skin around the animation, I noticed no yellowing at all. I think the reporting on this issue was greatly overblown. Many new filters are only available for one day and then disappear forever. It seems very clear to me that Snapchat monitors the daily use of each of the dozen-plus filters, keeping the ones that are currently used most, and removing the ones used least. The dog and the beauty filters survive because they have continuing popularity. It makes total business sense for Snapchat to change filters that way. Snapchat filters are just some fun stuff, I’ve seen nothing to get all worked up about.

  2. Setting up my own credibility, ive been across the country and have met a number of pleasant people of many different and varied cultural backgrounds and races. That being stated I personally am an amalgamation of different cultures, with dark skin to show it.

    So, when I read this piece I saw the potential for a fair argument and bore an open mind. Its highly difficult for me to read this without a pool of frustration. I feel like the main topic is a bit overblown compared to the subtext. Over all the primary topic could have been a focus on the fact that corporate or industrial racism is swept under the rug. But the main filters in question honestly are not nearly as racist as they seem. The main one pictured above even denotes an anime like expression and is noted even within certain lines. The reasoning that many are not finding it racist is due to the upbringing of the modern generation in which the reference is heavily clear. This can even be noted by the incredible recollection and popularity of the anime’s Dragon Ball Z and Sailor moon among students and children who grew up around the 90’s era of animation. Granted, I can agree the Bob Marley point is incredibly valid to the memeification of the artist as a whole. Unfortunately he synonymous with weed and weed culture, while his core pillars and accomplishments are thrown to the back seat.

    As a whole the piece written brings to light interesting points, but is too intense and too aggressive with its points. It focuses on points that contribute to the idea that we are overly sensitive, and reinforces it to a choking degree. I see a great deal of potential if broadened out for the outcry to resonate with many rather than the poisonous dose of pure concentrated sensitivity delivered.

Comments are closed.